In this article, Richard Birke explores four major ethical challenges businesses face as they adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace:
Confidentiality and Privacy
AI systems commonly draw from large data-sets, including uploaded documents or internal databases. If these systems reuse or expose private information (e.g., patient files, customer records) in ways not intended or expected, it can violate confidentiality agreements and client/student expectations.
Organizations are increasingly building private “sandbox” environments to mitigate these risks.
Accuracy
AI can deliver quick results, but it can also hallucinate or fabricate information (for example, legal documents that cite non-existent cases).
It’s recommended that AI be used as a draft or assist tool rather than a final source, and that humans fact-check outputs and disclose AI usage where appropriate.
Job Displacement
While some argue that AI will create many jobs, Birke emphasizes that certain roles (especially those amenable to automation) are at risk.
The likely scenario: human-AI “centaur” teams (humans working alongside AI) rather than full replacement. Employers must communicate clearly about how AI will affect roles and workforce size.
Bias and Resource Use
Bias: If AI systems draw on biased internet content or uncurated data (“garbage in, garbage out”), they may perpetuate harmful stereotypes or inaccuracies. Using sandboxed data and human oversight can reduce the risk.
Resource Use: AI systems consume large amounts of energy and resources (some estimates liken current AI fuel use to that of the airline industry). Ethical considerations include environmental impact and sustainability.
Bottom line: AI brings powerful opportunities, but also significant ethical considerations. Leaders need to address confidentiality, accuracy, workforce implications, bias, and sustainability—not just technological implementation. Birke writes:
“Most ethical quandaries have no clear answers… AI adds a degree of complexity to our world and, therefore, to the ethical choices facing businesses and their leaders.”
Disclaimer:
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals.